From b20079da97915019ca67c23f44bf45e99eb619d7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Stefano Stabellini Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2019 15:02:44 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] xen: actually skip the first MAX_ORDER bits in pfn_pdx_hole_setup pfn_pdx_hole_setup is meant to skip the first MAX_ORDER bits, but actually it only skips the first MAX_ORDER-1 bits. The issue was probably introduced by bdb5439c3f ("x86_64: Ensure frame-table compression leaves MAX_ORDER aligned"), when changing to loop to start from MAX_ORDER-1 an adjustment by 1 was needed in the call to find_next_bit() but not done. Fix the issue by passing j+1 and i+1 to find_next_zero_bit and find_next_bit. Also add a check for i >= BITS_PER_LONG because find_{,next_}zero_bit() are free to assume that their last argument is less than their middle one. Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich Acked-by: Julien Grall CC: andrew.cooper3@citrix.com CC: JBeulich@suse.com CC: George.Dunlap@eu.citrix.com CC: ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com CC: konrad.wilk@oracle.com CC: tim@xen.org CC: wei.liu2@citrix.com --- xen/common/pdx.c | 6 ++++-- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/xen/common/pdx.c b/xen/common/pdx.c index 50c21b6bf8..bb7e437049 100644 --- a/xen/common/pdx.c +++ b/xen/common/pdx.c @@ -83,8 +83,10 @@ void __init pfn_pdx_hole_setup(unsigned long mask) */ for ( j = MAX_ORDER-1; ; ) { - i = find_next_zero_bit(&mask, BITS_PER_LONG, j); - j = find_next_bit(&mask, BITS_PER_LONG, i); + i = find_next_zero_bit(&mask, BITS_PER_LONG, j + 1); + if ( i >= BITS_PER_LONG ) + break; + j = find_next_bit(&mask, BITS_PER_LONG, i + 1); if ( j >= BITS_PER_LONG ) break; if ( j - i > hole_shift ) -- 2.30.2